news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law, CNET has learned.

Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns, according to three individuals who have been negotiating with Leahy's staff over the changes. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.
Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.

CNET obtained a draft of the proposed amendments from one of the people involved in the negotiations with Leahy; it's embedded at the end of this post. The document describes the changes as "Amendments intended to be proposed by Mr. Leahy."

It's an abrupt departure from Leahy's earlier approach, which required police to obtain a search warrant backed by probable cause before they could read the contents of e-mail or other communications. The Vermont Democrat boasted last year that his bill "provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by... requiring that the government obtain a search warrant."

Leahy had planned a vote on an earlier version of his bill, designed to update a pair of 1980s-vintage surveillance laws, in late September. But after law enforcement groups including the National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association organizations objected to the legislation and asked him to "reconsider acting" on it, Leahy pushed back the vote and reworked the bill as a package of amendments to be offered next Thursday. The package (PDF) is a substitute for H.R. 2471, which the House of Representatives already has approved.

One person participating in Capitol Hill meetings on this topic told CNET that Justice Department officials have expressed their displeasure about Leahy's original bill. The department is on record as opposing any such requirement: James Baker, the associate deputy attorney general, has publicly warned that requiring a warrant to obtain stored e-mail could have an "adverse impact" on criminal investigations.

Christopher Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said requiring warrantless access to Americans' data "undercuts" the purpose of Leahy's original proposal. "We believe a warrant is the appropriate standard for any contents," he said.

An aide to the Senate Judiciary committee told CNET that because discussions with interested parties are ongoing, it would be premature to comment on the legislation.

Marc Rotenberg, head of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that in light of the revelations about how former CIA director David Petraeus' e-mail was perused by the FBI, "even the Department of Justice should concede that there's a need for more judicial oversight," not less.

Markham Erickson, a lawyer in Washington, D.C. who has followed the topic closely and said he was speaking for himself and not his corporate clients, expressed concerns about the alphabet soup of federal agencies that would be granted more power:

There is no good legal reason why federal regulatory agencies such as the NLRB, OSHA, SEC or FTC need to access customer information service providers with a mere subpoena. If those agencies feel they do not have the tools to do their jobs adequately, they should work with the appropriate authorizing committees to explore solutions. The Senate Judiciary committee is really not in a position to adequately make those determinations.

The list of agencies that would receive civil subpoena authority for the contents of electronic communications also includes the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Maritime Commission, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Mine Enforcement Safety and Health Review Commission.

Leahy's modified bill retains some pro-privacy components, such as requiring police to secure a warrant in many cases. But the dramatic shift, especially the regulatory agency loophole and exemption for emergency account access, likely means it will be near-impossible for tech companies to support in its new form.

A bitter setback
This is a bitter setback for Internet companies and a liberal-conservative-libertarian coalition, which had hoped to convince Congress to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to protect documents stored in the cloud. Leahy glued those changes onto an unrelated privacy-related bill supported by Netflix.

At the moment, Internet users enjoy more privacy rights if they store data on their hard drives or under their mattresses, a legal hiccup that the companies fear could slow the shift to cloud-based services unless the law is changed to be more privacy-protective.

Members of the so-called Digital Due Process coalition include Apple, Amazon.com, Americans for Tax Reform, AT&T, the Center for Democracy and Technology, eBay, Google, Facebook, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, TechFreedom, and Twitter. (CNET was the first to report on the coalition's creation.)

Leahy, a former prosecutor, has a mixed record on privacy. He criticized the FBI's efforts to require Internet providers to build in backdoors for law enforcement access, and introduced a bill in the 1990s protecting Americans' right to use whatever encryption products they wanted.

But he also authored the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which is now looming over Web companies, as well as the reviled Protect IP Act. An article in The New Republic concluded Leahy's work on the Patriot Act "appears to have made the bill less protective of civil liberties." Leahy had introduced significant portions of the Patriot Act under the name Enhancement of Privacy and Public Safety in Cyberspace Act (PDF) a year earlier.

One obvious option for the Digital Due Process coalition is the simplest: if Leahy's committee proves to be an insurmountable roadblock in the Senate, try the courts instead.

Judges already have been wrestling with how to apply the Fourth Amendment to an always-on, always-connected society. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police needed a search warrant for GPS tracking of vehicles. Some courts have ruled that warrantless tracking of Americans' cell phones, another coalition concern, is unconstitutional.

The FBI and other law enforcement agencies already must obtain warrants for e-mail in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, thanks to a ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2010.

I confess that I just hate these god-damn niggers running around. A few days ago I had to go to the bank to cash a check. It was a sizable amount so had to go inside instead of the drive-thru. I went in and stood in the long ling waiting for a teller while looking around. I haven't been in there since last month and the place looked like shit! The nice furniture they had before was replaced by some mauve upholstery and the nice shiny stone floor was replaced by this ugly tan carpeting!

When the line moved up, I got closer to the tellers. Three were humans and one was a big fat sheboon with corn rows and a gold front tooth. I thought it was a male at first but two saggy mountains were attached to its chest! I silently prayed that I would get one of the humans, 3/4 odds isn't bad odds. Finally, the lady in front of me was called up by a man and the nigger was the only one open. It hollered "Next?! C'mon up he-re Mista!". I pretended like I didn't notice since I wanted to wait for a human but they were busy with customers.

The idiot behind me tapped me on my shoulder and said "That lady on the left is open, sir." Then I just decided to go up to the sheboon as I was too considerate of others to hold up a line like a nigger would. I went up to the sheboon and presented my check to it.

"Is this real?" it asked me with an odd ball glance. I nodded silently but was thinking "of course it is you stupid ass nigger!" Then the sheboon typed into the computer and had me give my ID. I been a customer of this bank for 12 years and this was the first nigger who serviced me. I had given it a form so it would deposit most and I wanted two thousand eighty in cash. I was given a receipt that showed the money was now in my account.

The nigger started counting out the cash I was owed and when finished, gave me it. I counted it to myself because I didn't trust this nigger and sure enough I was about two hundred short! I axed the sheboon that it made a mistake and I needed two hundred more. "But Is counted it, mista!" it yelled out. I said "No, when I counted there was two hundred missing. Can I see the manager!" The nigger snarled and yelled back "You musta hid it in yours pocket! I counted the change right!"

All the commotion had alerted a security guard who came over and demanded to know what the problem was. I told him that this sheboon took $200 from me. She screamed that she counted it fairly and that I was hiding it. The manager finally came over from hearing the loud fuss the sheboon was making and asked what was going on. I filled him in while the sow began squealing that she counted it right. I gave him the money and he counted it. Sho nuff, there was $200 short. He told the sheboon so but she yelled "He musta hided it!" I said that the sheboon saw me count the money right in front of her and I had no time to hide anything. I said they could even look at the surveillance camera if they wanted.

After I brought up the camera, miraculously the sheboon put $200 on the counter saying it fell on the floor while she was counting. I didn't buy it at all because niggers are criminals. I don't know how this one got a job at the bank unless AA or a liberal was responsible. The manager apologized to me and gave me a free tote bag that they give out to those who open new accounts. I didn't accept and told him that I wanted to close my account. This one niggerfuxated experience was enough for me!

I then left the bank and got into my car. I then called a friend to tell him of what happened. Twenty minutes or so later, I started to pull out of the parking lot but then as I'm driving away I see that sheboon with two security guards outside the building! I think it got fired or arrested..or both . I won't be going to that bank again. If they are stupid enough to hire one nigger then more and more will come in eventually. My friend recommended his bank that doesn't have any nigger tellers at all and that's where I opened a new account that very day.

Anybody else ever have coon-tact with niggers, and it just ruins your day?

S&M
There is a part of us
that isn't quite alive

while showing the bright side
her hidden darkness emerged
when I tricked her into hurting herself

she would say come on trick me, tick me, trick me
and I would tell her
Count Dragool with tube fingers would take her slow
if she hit her self hard across the mouth
and she would scream to Eden
bash mashley thrash me
I want the men with red tridents
and ding dong tails too
while she watched my eyes like surveillance drones as if a great confederation of cocks marched towards her

certainly not painless
but the pain of an addict
who knows all to well the pleasure of the needle
first the little sting and then the great oooow
of becoming eaten kingo flinks
and potato chips
by the pussy arts master

she is butter on the stove
im the rare drug
a Do Do bird beaking flesh
a cold hard penetration
she a yielding intricacy of complications
a bald Rapunzel
feeling under abused til now
with black crow lips and jumbo bangled earings
like a long jangling math problem that ends
with a big O
O popping grapes
like pink flower hysterical nipples
popping co co pops
on a singing red bed

her limbs a yawing stretch
of insanity sane
her body a torn zipper
being yanked up and down

a frenzy of crying blasphemies and knotted kisses
dancing the bend over
cha cha cha

I've got a request. It's a video I've searched for for years now, and I'm beginning to wonder if I imagined it. It was a surveillance footage tape shot from behind the counter of a convenience or liquor store. There is no audio. A woman walks up to the counter, talks to the clerk, then unzips her shirt and flashes a pair of saggy titties, then laughs, zips back up and leaves. I can't find it online anywhere. Does this ring a bell to anyone?

I work(ed) for Macy's, I got fired today. SO here goes:
I worked for the visual surveillance department which handled all video surveillance operations at the store. In the dressing rooms, theres always a banner which says that same sex professionals view dressing rooms for men and women. This is a lie, big big lie. There are usually a group of 8-10 people watching over all changing rooms and although we do have a few women in the team, there is no separation between the viewing booths for males and females. So if you've ever tried something on at Macy's, trust me, you're been watched!

Thank you.

HELP!
I am a 32 year old GAY male who works as a pharmacy tech. N E wayz, I was swiping some codeine, vicodin, percocet, and fentanyl. My coworker (this ugly bitch named Diana) caught me. She said that if I want the surveillance tape of me stealing candy then I not only have to fuck her but make her cum. The thought of fucking a pussy makes me sick! It prolly stinks and tastes weird. To complicate matters, I have a serious boyfriend.
How to you fuck a girl? I don't even know which flap to put my dick in. Aren't there two holes? Also how do I make her 'cum'? Do chicks really cum? And how long does it take? The picture is of her.

The sheep just keep letting this shit slide..better hide your tracks better bitches because Big Brother wants to watch you even more. Freedom of speech? HAHAH

Canada's government Tuesday introduced a bill to give law enforcement authorities sweeping powers to probe online communications, but the move sparked criticism about threats to privacy.

But "by expanding the legal tools of the state to conduct surveillance and access private information, and by reducing the depth of judicial scrutiny... (the bill would allow the) government to subject more individuals to surveillance and scrutiny."

Further more it goes "far beyond simply maintaining investigative capacity or modernizing search powers. Rather, (it) added significant new capabilities for investigators to track, and search and seize digital information about individuals."

The legislation would require telecommunications service providers to set up systems that allow police or Canada's spy service to intercept communications as part of their investigations.

http://breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0f0f45ab01c8fa04e4b488d1b8562ee9.181&show_article=1

lol beast gets logged. as in beast in the bedroom not bestially. you guys sure pissed some people off if you're doing this kind of Draconian surveillance.

lol, which one of you is this?
http://fox2now.com/2013/01/02/surveillance-video-catches-man-havin-sex-with-mini-horses/

Four things you didn't know about Martin Luther King

1. His name wasn't Martin Luther. It was Michael. It was decided Martin Luther had a more prominent ring to it, so he went by that. He never legally changed his name. To this day, he lived and died as Michael King.

2. While working on his dissertation for his doctoral degree at Boston University, he heavily plagiarized from another author who had done research on a subject similar to King's. As academic committee later found that over half of King's work was plagiarized, yet would not revoke his doctrine. King was dead by this time, and the committee ruled that revoking the title would serve no purpose. It was also discovered that King's famous I HAVE A DREAM speech was also not his own. He stole it from a sermon by Archibald Carey,a popular black preacher in the 1950's.

3. King was under FBI surveillance for several years (until he died) due to his ties with communist organizations throughout the country. King accepted money from the organizations to fund his movements. In return, King had to appoint communist leaders to run certain districts of his SCLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference), who then could project their communist ideas to larger audiences. A federal judge in the 60's ruled that the FBI files on King links to communism to remain top-secret until 2027. Senator Jesse Helms appealed to the Supreme Court in 1983 to release the files, so the correct bill in the Senate to create the Martin Luther King Federal Holiday could be abolished. He was denied.

4. One of King's closest friends, Rev. Ralph Abernathy, wrote a book in 1989 in which he talked about King's obsession with white prostitutes. King would often use church donations to have drunken sex parties, where he would hire two to three white prostitutes, occasionally beating them brutally. This has also been reported by the FBI agents who monitored King. King was married with four children.

Martin Luther King Day. A day when this country will come to a screeching halt so we can have parades and memorials to honor this man, a man that most of the world views as a saint for his role in the civil rights movement. No other public holiday in the United States honors a single individual. Of all the great leaders in our Nation's history-none of them have their own holiday. All of our great war heroes share Memorial Day. All of our great p********s share p********'s Day. Yet king � a man who was a phony, a cheater, a traitor, and a sexual degenerate gets a day of his own.

FUCK MLK DAY--I'M GOING TO WORK

this stated out as a response to another post, I felt that it deserved its own thread, so here goes.

wrked my way through college as a retail security detective, not the uniform losers that walk around the main mall, the ones that r hired by the main retailers to work in the store. Basically 3 guys sitting in a room looking at 100's of cameras. You can go only so long b4 you stop watching the merch and start watching the jb and milfs. WE'd catch pervy dudes all the time doing shit like that. flasher/jakers , upskirt shooters with shoe cams and that kinda shit. This was the early says of interwebs and some of its true potential was being seen. It was found on a messege board that mens room was a regular metting area for guys on the DL to get freaky with each other. It was a real phun job for awhile, and little did they know that people behind the camera were bigger pervs than the ones we were looking for. we had a great team 5 pretty major pervs a boss who really did not understand the technology too well and a cool female was not onto our perveyness but was determined to do her job. so when s group of JBs would be pulled in for shoplifting and all we knew they had was not recovered it was off to interview/ holding room for a strip search. For our saftey this room was under obvious video surveillance. Off would go the cool female detective and strip them down 1 by 1, and of course we made a show of how the monitor of that camera would be turned of and how all main monitors recorders were off and how we would standing outside the camera room while the search occured. little did super detective know that it was very easy to divert siginal from that camera to another rarely used recorder. IT was awesome, especially when they stole bras and panties(more so back then, b4 moms were willing let their daughters slut it up so the only way to get it was to steal it). I would always fantasize that the female detective would get them naked and then force them to perform sex acts on her. She was so demanding of them it was like watching the first few minutes of a femmsub/femdom porn movie. so fucking hot, 10 years later and it stills rolls into the spank bank once in a while.
PS
that camera in that interview/holding room was a rig job becasue the company did want to shell out for industry standard types. So we got a nice mid-range home movie camera from the returns pile and used that, the great thing about that was it meant we would have audio too. just ran some speaker wire to the camera room and slapped some RCA ends on it and hook it up to the recorder and its all good. When the "I'll do anything not get in trouble" line comes out you almost get an instant hard on. I wish that i could say that audio hook up was some master stroke of genus, but really this room was on the edge of the outside wall of the store, and if you put a radio in there you could pump the audio back into the other room which was too far to get any reception. So my obsessive need to hear Howard Stern every morning led me to have some great visual and auditory voyeuristic experiences while i was in my mid 20's.
Man i wish i could have fucked one of those little sluts, but it was too hard, if you were even caught alone in a room 1 male and 1 female suspect just for a few minutes you could loose your job. So if it were 2 guys working and you caught a female you would have grab one of the female managers of the floor as you were escorting the suspect back to the "room". in some cases it would be ok if you looked the girl in the room alone as long as you did not go inside until a female showed up. The closest i ever came was one time when it was us 2 dudes and we grabed this smoking hot little punky emo type, she was in the room with the door open and were waithing for a female and new it was going to take a little while because the store was busy. The girl starts crying and "says I'll do ANYTHING if you make this go away" my partner and I looked at each in a little bit of shock, and then his look seemed to give the impression "if you can get it done in 5min go for it" not only was he my partner for the day but he was also my boss, the manager for the department. IT never came to it because no to long after the looks the female manager showed up. This one was real classic for another reason, we decide not to call the police and just had her over to her mother, becasue of her age we generally give them a free pass, as long as the parents are reachable and can arrive in a reasonable amount of time that is what we would do. So the mother shows up all piss and vinegar, then all the sudden the girl goes into seizure like state. I perform first aide and all is well, but the mother is just so glad that she was ok that she had forgotten all the reasons she was here and no longer mad at the daughter. I knew she was faking i, so glad that i did not stick my dick in it who knows what kinda phyco drama she could come up with after that. But in the end I did get a chance to feel her amazing perky OLD tits while I was checking vitals.