Your cock is special. As cocks are very valuable, uploading a picture with your cock on top of the banana in the illustration will result in USD 1 being donated to a charity.

Dewez posted this last month. It's a great, simple illustration of what can be seen as cp and what is okay to post.

Many criminal cases, even when investigated by the most
experienced and best qualified investigators, are ultimately
solved by an admission or confession from the person responsible
for committing the crime. Oftentimes, investigators are able to
secure only a minimal amount of evidence, be it physical or
circumstantial, that points directly to a suspect, and in many
instances, this evidence is not considered strong enough by
prosecutors to obtain a conviction. In such cases, the
interrogation of the suspects and their subsequent confessions
are of prime importance.

This article addresses the question of why suspects speak
freely to investigators, and ultimately, sign full confessions.
The physical and psychological aspects of confession and how
they relate to successful interrogations of suspects are also
discussed, as is the "breakthrough," the point in the
interrogation when suspects make an admission, no matter how
minuscule, that begins the process of obtaining a full
confession.

DEFINING INTERROGATION

Interrogation is the questioning of a person suspected of
having committed a crime. (1) It is designed to match acquired
information to a particular suspect in order to secure a
confession. (2) The goals of interrogation include:

* To learn the truth of the crime and how it happened

* To obtain an admission of guilt from the suspect

* To obtain all the facts to determine the method of
operation and the circumstances of the crime in question

* To gather information that enables investigators to arrive
at logical conclusions

* To provide information for use by the prosecutor in
possible court action. (3)

Knowing the definition and objectives of the interrogation,
the question then asked is, "Why do suspects confess?"
Self-condemnation and self-destruction are not normal human
behavioral characteristics. Human beings ordinarily do not
utter unsolicited, spontaneous confessions. (4) It is logical
to conclude, therefore, that when suspects are taken to police
stations to be questioned concerning their involvement in a
particular crime, their immediate reaction will be a refusal to
answer any questions. With the deluge of television programs
that present a clear picture of the Miranda warning and its
application to suspects, one would conclude that no one
questioned about a crime would surrender incriminating
information, much less supply investigators with a signed, full
confession. It would also seem that once suspects sense the
direction in which the investigators are heading, the
conversation would immediately end. However, for various
psychological reasons, suspects continue to speak with
investigators.

SUSPECT PARANOIA

Suspects are never quite sure of exactly what information
investigators possess. They know that the police are
investigating the crime, and in all likelihood, suspects have
followed media accounts of their crimes to determine what leads
the police have. Uppermost in their minds, however, is how to
escape detection and obtain firsthand information about the
investigation and where it is heading.

Such "paranoia" motivates suspects to accompany the police
voluntarily for questioning. Coupled with curiosity, this
paranoia motivates suspects to appear at police headquarters as
"concerned citizens" who have information pertinent to the case.
By doing this, suspects may attempt to supply false or
noncorroborative information in order to lead investigators
astray, gain inside information concerning the case from
investigators, and remove suspicion from themselves by offering
information on the case so investigators will not suspect their
involvement.

For example, in one case, a 22-year-old woman was
discovered in a stairwell outside of a public building. The
woman had been raped and was found naked and bludgeoned.
Investigators interviewed numerous people during the next
several days but were unable to identify any suspects. Media
coverage on the case was extremely high.

Several days into the investigation, a 23-year-old man
appeared at police headquarters with two infants in tow and
informed investigators that he believed he may have some
information regarding the woman's death. The man revealed that
when he was walking home late one evening, he passed the area
where the woman was found and observed a "strange individual"
lurking near an adjacent phone booth. The man said that because
he was frightened of the stranger, he ran back to his home.
After reading the media accounts of the girl's death, he
believed that he should tell the police what he had observed.

The man gave police a physical description of the
"stranger" and then helped an artist to compose a sketch of the
individual. After he left, investigators discovered that the
sketch bore a strong resemblance to the "witness" who provided
the information.

After further investigation, the witness was asked to
return to the police station to answer more questions, which he
did gladly. Some 15 hours into the interrogation, he confessed
to one of his "multiple personalities" having killed the woman,
who was unknown to him, simply because the victim was a woman,
which is what the suspect had always wanted to be.

This case clearly illustrates the need for some suspects to
know exactly what is happening in an investigation. In their
minds, they honestly believe that by hiding behind the guise of
"trying to help," they will, without incriminating themselves,
learn more about the case from the investigators.

INTERROGATION SETTING

In any discussion concerning interrogation, it is necessary
to include a review of the surroundings where a suspect is to be
interrogated. Because there is a general desire to maintain
personal integrity before family members and peer groups,
suspects should be removed from familiar surroundings and taken
to a location that has an atmosphere more conducive to
cooperativeness and truthfulness. (5) The primary psychological
factor contributing to successful interrogations is privacy--
being totally alone with suspects. (6) This privacy prompts
suspects to feel willing to unload the burden of guilt. (7) The
interrogation site should isolate the suspect so that only the
interrogator is present. The suspect's thoughts and responses
should be free from all outside distractions or stimuli.

The interrogation setting also plays an important part in
obtaining confessions. The surroundings should reduce suspect
fears and contribute to the inclination to discuss the crime.
Because fear is a direct reinforcement for defensive mechanisms
(resistance), it is important to erase as many fears as
possible. (8) Therefore, the interrogation room should
establish a business atmosphere as opposed to a police-like
atmosphere. While drab, barren interrogation rooms increase
fear in suspects, a location that displays an open,
you-have-nothing-to fear quality about it can do much to break
down interrogation defensiveness, thereby eliminating a major
barrier. (9) The interrogators tend to disarm the suspects
psychologically by placing them in surroundings that are free
from any fear-inducing distractions.

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS

More than likely, suspects voluntarily accompany
investigators, either in response to a police request to answer
questions or in an attempt to learn information about the
investigation. Once settled in the interrogation room, the
interrogators should treat suspects in a civilized manner, no
matter how vicious or serious the crime might have been. While
they may have feelings of disgust for the suspects, the goal is
to obtain a confession, and it is important that personal
emotions not be revealed. (10)

Investigators should also adopt a compassionate attitude and
attempt to establish a rapport with suspects. In most cases,
suspects commit crimes because they believe that it offers the
best solution to their needs at the moment. (11) Two rules of
thumb to remember are: 1) "There but for the grace of God go
I"; and 2) it is important to establish a common level of
understanding with the suspects. (12) These rules are critical
to persuading suspects to be open, forthright, and honest.
Suspects should be persuaded to look beyond the investigators'
badges and see, instead, officers who listen without judging.
If investigators are able to convince suspects that the key
issue is not the crime itself, but what motivated them to commit
the crime, they will begin to rationalize or explain their
motivating factors.

At this stage of the interrogation, investigators are on
the brink of having suspects break through remaining defensive
barriers to admit involvement in the crime. This is the
critical stage of the interrogation process known as the
breakthrough.

THE BREAKTHROUGH

The breakthrough is the point in the interrogation when
suspects make an admission, no matter how small. (13) In spite of
having been advised of certain protections guaranteed by the
Constitution, most suspects feel a need to confess. Both
hardcore criminals and first-time offenders suffer from the same
pangs of conscience. (14) This is an indication that their defense
mechanisms are diminished, and at this point, the investigators
may push through to elicit the remaining elements of confession.

In order for interrogators to pursue a successful
breakthrough, they must recognize and understand certain
background factors that are unique to a particular suspect.
Many times, criminals exhibit psychological problems that are
the result of having come from homes torn by conflict and
dissension. Also frequently found in the backgrounds of
criminals are parental rejection and inconsistent and severe
punishment. (15) It is important that investigators see beyond
the person sitting before them and realize that past experiences
can impact on current behavior. Once interrogators realize
that the fear of possible punishment, coupled with the loss of
pride in having to admit to committing mistakes, is the basic
inhibitor they must overcome in suspects, they will quickly be
able to formulate questions and analyze responses that will
break through the inhibitors.

SUCCESSFUL INTERROGATIONS

Investigators must conduct every interrogation with the
belief that suspects, when presented with the proper avenue,
will use it to confess their crimes. Research indicates that
most guilty persons who confess are, from the outset, looking
for the proper opening during the interrogation to communicate
their guilt to the interrogators. (16)

Suspects confess when the internal anxiety caused by their
deception outweighs their perceptions of the crime's
consequences. (17) In most instances, suspects have magnified,
in their minds, both the severity of the crime and the possible
repercussions. Interrogators should allay suspect anxiety by
putting these fears into perspective.

Suspects also make admissions or confessions when they
believe that cooperation is the best course of action. (18) If
they are convinced that officers are prepared to listen to all
of the circumstances surrounding the crimes, they will begin to
talk. The psychological and physiological pressures that build
in a person who has committed a crime are best alleviated by
communicating. (19) In order to relieve these suppressed
pressures, suspects explain the circumstances of their crimes
they confess.

And, finally, suspects confess when interrogators are able
to speculate correctly on why the crimes were committed.
Suspects want to know ahead of time that interrogators will
believe what they have to say and will understand what motivated
them to commit the crime.

CONCLUSION

It is natural for suspects to want to preserve their
privacy, civil rights, and liberties. It is also natural for
suspects to resist discussing their criminal acts. For these
very reasons, however, investigators must develop the skills
that enable them to disarm defensive resistors established by
suspects during interrogation. Before suspects will confess,
they must feel comfortable in their surroundings, and they must
have confidence in the interrogators, who should attempt to gain
this confidence by listening intently to them and by allowing
them to verbalize their accounts of the crimes.

Interrogators who understand what motivates suspects to
confess will be better able to formulate effective questions and
analyze suspect responses. Obviously, more goes into gaining a
confession than is contained in this article. However, if the
interrogator fails to understand the motivations of the suspect,
other factors impacting on obtaining the confession will be less
effective.

I don't know if I'm reading you incorrectly
but it seems to me, that you want to fuck me
your words written so seductively
your body inviting me to kiss your skin so passionately
rub your brown skin so sensually
patiently waiting to taste every essence of your soul
spread your ass cheeks so I could watch your pussy swallow my dick
got me erected just thinking about it
your body so physically gifted
can't wait to get up in it
I know your sex so damn splendid
wishing every minute my dick was sliding in it
friction to perfection you riding my erection
my imagination fully illustrated both participating in seduction
you kissing me, I'm fucking you
your pretty breast getting some attention too
feel my dick inside while kissing your nipples with pride
sucking and licking your pussy gliding on my dick
perfection reaches it's ultimate peak
feel my liquid passion rushing inside
combination of our juices completing our sexual wishes. El Sacerdote

Who's sister has also asked to see his hard dick?

Note: illustrative image

I confess I am a 53 year old,accomplished professional man in the health field. My fiancee is 2 years older,also a professional, a dedicated mother of her own as well as adopted children and as well as a proud, doting grandmother.

I mention this to preface and illustrate the dichotomy that we love living each and every day. This is both as a couple and individuals. Very simply my woman is and has been since VERY young, a shameless, no limits cumslut. I LOVE being in love with a nasty cum loving, cock craxed whore! In fact I am her cuck, a cocksucking cuck at that.

One of my/our many sick perversions is sharing the many TRUE experiences with those who have similar, culturally unacceptable interests, especially those who have lived them.

To share a quick example, while out of town on business, yesterday I received a package that contained 2 pairs of her panties sealed in a plastic bag. They were both covered and soaked with cum, one of them more then the other. If replies to this HONEST post from those interested in my story's contents outnumber those questioning the validity, believability or moral admonishment, I will continue sharing more details of our life of debauchery. I'm just not interested in wasting my time defending my lifestyle nor it's authenticity.

at this time i will confess myself unto you, but i WILL NOT reveal my identity. try not to overreact...

i am genetically superior sub-human prototype. born with capabilities that if described one will be rendered comatose by the sheer magnitude of sentence structure required to illustrate the multi-verse of awe, as you humans would call it. the mere transcendence of the DNA rubicon that occurs when i simply pass wind would baffle even the smartest minds.
but among my supra strenghts are a few that you morons can comprehend. they are as displayed:

- i can travel through time. the only limitation is that i travel at the speed of one second per second.
- i can temporarily breathe underwater.
- i have the ability to stop a speeding bullet with my body, once.
-i can talk to animals, unfortunately i am still not able to understand what they say.
- i can recall past events.
- i can predict the future with an astonishing 5% accuracy rate.
- i can fly, but only towards Earth.

Longtime head football coach of Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) Joe Paterno was fired last week for his failure to handle charges of rape and sexual abuse of young men brought against former Penn State defense coordinator Jerry Sandusky back in 2002. Indeed, many within the athletic department and school administration have lost their jobs over this blatant cover-up, and Paterno�s 46-year coaching legacy is now irrevocably besmirched.
But November 9, 2011, the date of Paterno�s firing, is also notable as the date when we learned exactly why college football is accurately described as the Opiate of America. Thousands of Penn State students, almost all white, took the streets to riot as the news became public.

They didn�t riot over the fact that Philadelphia is now home to some of the most violent Flash Mobs in the country. They didn�t riot over the hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loan debt they will rack up in earning a degree that will get them a job serving tables. No�they rioted over the firing of a coach who concealed the raping of boys by a pederast whom the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) probably considers a hero.
Is it any wonder that the United States is in its current parlous situation? Jobs are being shipped overseas. Those students preparing to graduate from Penn State are about to enter one of the worst job markets in history. Yet they riot over the dismissal of a head coach--a man they apparently credited with the same God-like qualities as the Steve Jobs was upon his death.

There�s more. Lost in the present furor is the fact that, over the last 10 years, Penn State has come to rely on disreputable recruits to keep alive the football glory of the past. Sports Illustrated recently found that Penn State ranked fourth in the 2010 Top 25 for players with the highest arrest rates.

Indeed, today the bulk of the players on any college football team have no business attending the school--and would not be there if were it not for their ability to elicit the blind devotion on display in the Paterno riot.

Full story here..

http://vdare.com/articles/joe-paterno-and-the-penn-state-rape-scandal-discrediting-the-opiate-of-america

Ok. Who needs child porn to get into trouble on Motherless. If I posted detailed instructions and illustrations to make bombs, silencers, lock picking techniques, lasers, and military techniques and other devious devices do you think the Motherless fuckers would report me to the F B I?

Paparazzi candids of Irina Shayk caught topless at a shoot in Hawaii for Sports Illustrated. Doing a good job at covering her chest but here are pics of her tits exposed. Anyone else want the job of rubbing sand into a topless model?

Slave fantasy of mine. I'll just illustrate the setup because the entire thing is just way too long.

"Toy". " yes master?" "I have decided that I am going to hurt you very badly today. Not because of anything you have done but because it will please me greatly." "Yes master, whatever you like." "We will play a little game you and I. Today I will only use 2 instruments on you and you will get to partially decide when I use one of them. The first is a 20" piece of 16 gauge electrical wire attached to a wooden dowl. I will use this to whip you until you decide I can use the second tool. The second tool is a soldering iron. Here are the rules. You must endure the whipping for 1 hour minimum before selecting the soldering iron. The soldering iron will be inserted into your pussy for no more than 10 seconds and no less than 2 seconds. You will be able to lower the time the soldering iron is in your pussy by enduring an additional 15 minutes of whipping with the wire for every second taken off. To get it all the way down to 2 seconds you must endure 3 hours of whipping with the wire and no place on your body will be safe from the wire save for your pretty face. I prefer that intact. You will be tied standing and spread eagle. If you pass out at any time during thi's ordeal the timer will be stopped until you awaken and we resume. I will not ask you if you are ready because it does not matter to me. Now, strip."